« Sony Pictures Names Mitch Singer CTO | Main | Syndicated Shows Performing Poorly »

Dec13
Marquee Holdings Wants to Take AMC Public Again

AMC Entertainment Inc., the second-largest theater chain in the U.S., is to be taken public by its parent company Marquee Holdings Inc. They are planning to file an initial public offering of common stock. No details of price, amount of stock or date have been announced.

The company currently operates 411 theaters with 5,635 screens in the U.S. and 10 other countries.
 
Private investors purchased the company in 2004 for $2 billion; including J.P. Morgan partners and Apollo management.

AMC evidently was taken private because it couldn't compete with its major competitor Regal, although its said in other terms like "it was trading at a discount tAMC%20Theaters%20Going%20Public.jpgo Regal."

A couple of things they've done since going private was to purchase Loews Cineplex Entertainment Corp., which added 198 theaters and 2,235 screens to their inventory. They've also eliminated poorly performing theaters by 260.

Other than making money for the private investors, I don't see the value in this. For example, last month their quarterly reports showed a $10.7 million loss, about the same as last year. In other words there is absolutely no growth in profits. And that's with revenue growing by 56% to $422.5 million for the quarter. For the year there was a loss of $189.7 million on $2.4 billion in revenue.

Somehow they've even gotten a few analysts to spin this as something positive.

What's the bottom line for investors though? Why buy something like this? There are plenty of things out there that have a much better health and outlook than the diminishing theater business. No matter how you spin it, this will continue. Long-term anything in this space is a lemon. The industry will be shaking out for years, and nothing consistent could be counted on.

Buying more of the same thing through acquiring Loews adds nothing to show any value, other than more money-losing buildings. If I were them I'd keep this private until they add real value to the company, not some window-dressing they've added just to get a return back on their money. In reality I think media companies in this time of disruption are much better off being private than public. I don't see why they even would want to do this; it makes no sense at all.


0 Comments/Trackbacks




submit a trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry:

post a comment

Name, Email Address, and URL are not required fields.





Comment Preview

« Sony Pictures Names Mitch Singer CTO | Main | Syndicated Shows Performing Poorly »

Advertise

Related Resources


American Gangster - Web's top movie destinations, Fandango, the nation's largest movie ticketing service

sponsored ads



Incredible Hall of Acclaim.

subscribe


Prefer Email?
Subscribe below-

Enter your Email:


Powered by FeedBlitz What's this?

Current News

Support This Blog

My site was nominated for Best Entertainment Blog!

business social media

Use these fast growing business social media sites to promote your business, feature your products, spotlight your business leaders, create links, and drive traffic back to your company site, all for free!

BIZZlogos - Add your logo - free link to your site
BIZZphotos - Add photos of your products and people
BIZZprofiles - Submit your profile and build your online visibility
BIZZspotlight - Spotlight your business with free links
BIZZvideos - Videos about businesses, products and business people.
BIZZbites - "Digg" for Business - Submit your articles and posts

know more media network

View Network Map

Network Feed List (OPML)

Know More Media Network
Feed


we support unitus

PRWeb

Influencer



BizofShowBiz is a member of the Know More Media network of business related blogs.

Here are some current headlines from some of our business publications:

ProductivityGoal

CallCenterScript

AdHurl

TheBizofKnowledge

LandingTheDeal

CustomersAreAlways

HealthCareVox

WebMetricsGuru

TheInsurancePolicy

MarketingBlurb